Central corneal occurrence and you may intercourse, cultural classification

0
4

Central corneal occurrence and you may intercourse, cultural classification

The people had comprehensive attention test composed of a review out of artwork acuity on the Snellen graph, a great biomicroscopic comparison of your prior phase having slit light biomicroscopy (Zeiss design), fundus test having a beneficial ninety diopter Volk contact, IOP measured playing with Goldman applanation tonometry and you may gonioscopy over playing with Zeiss 4mirror lens. CCT is actually mentioned because of the a message ultrasound pachymeter (Pachmate DGH55, DGH-KOI, Inc. Shermans Dale, PA, USA). Immediately after applying of regional anesthetic broker, CCT are counted regarding cardiovascular system of the children carrying new probe perpendicular towards cornea, when you look at the give eyes and you may resting status of patient. Typically twenty-five straight specifications was indeed filed in the for every single eye, in a way that for each and every tape got a standard deviation = 0.2 within eyes. OHT try recognized as unattended IOP > 21 mmHg with no optic nerve lead transform recommending GON and you may regular VF. POAG is detected on the basis of a study of an open irido-corneal perspective away from 360°, zero angle pathology, that have IOP twenty-two mmHg otherwise over in people above 35 age old, while JOAG are recognized when it comes to those lower than thirty five years old yet conference the other requirements of POAG. NTG are recognized in case your IOP are

Inhabitants services

A maximum of 162 attention of 162 consecutive customers was incorporated contained in this study. Every recruited people was indeed black colored Ethiopian people. They made-up 108 males (66.7 %) and you escort Edinburg can 54 girls (33.step 3 %). Mediocre age the study population try 59.step three ± several.8 many years (anywhere between 20 so you’re able to century). The typical age of female is actually 55.4 ± 11.8 many years if you are compared to boys is actually 61.dos ± a dozen.8 years. So it huge difference is statistically high (p = 0.006; t try).

PXG are the preferred medical medical diagnosis in 67 customers (41.4 %), followed closely by POAG, 42 (twenty-five.9 %), and you can PACG, twenty-eight (17.step three %), as per Desk 1. Average many years (±SD) on the PXG, POAG, PACG, NTG and you will OHT organizations was 64.6 (±ten.8), 60.4 (±ten.3), 53.2 (±9.9), 57.8 (±10.3), and 51.5 (±16.1) years correspondingly. The difference was basically mathematically extreme (p Desk 1 Features of one’s populace

Intraocular tension

Average IOP of the studies inhabitants are 33.5 ± mmHg; Average IOP wasn’t different ranging from people, (33.nine ± 10.7 mmHg) and lady (thirty two.nine ± eleven.eight mmHg), (p = 0.58). Brand new mean IOP to have PXG (37.4 ± nine.six mmHg), PACG (36.0 ± 11.0) and JOAG (38.2 ± 13.1) people had been more than people who have POAG clients (29.4 ± 9.5) and you can OHT (28.8 ± 3.9) patients. That it differences is mathematically high (p Table dos Imply many years, intraocular tension (IOP) and you will Central corneal density (CCT) one of many health-related sandwich- groups

Main corneal occurrence

Mediocre CCT of analysis populace try ± ?m (min- max: 424–659). Linear regression research indicated that there is a statistically significant refuse regarding CCT with state-of-the-art years (roentgen dos = 033, p = 0.02, Fig. 1). So it development was seen to be similar within the men (r 2 = 0.049, p = 0.022), but the decline with age in females was not statistically significant (roentgen 2 = 0.00, p = 0.91).

Ladies got an average CCT of ± ?m (min- max: 424–641) whenever you are guys had the typical CCT from ± ?m (min- max: 436–659). The difference wasn’t mathematically high (P = 0.064). CCT was also maybe not significantly various other between your cultural groups (P = 0.step three, Dining table step three).

Central corneal occurrence predicated on classification

Mediocre (±SD) CCT regarding the subtypes was basically: PXG ( ± ?m), POAG ( ± ?m), PACG ( ± ?m), NTG ( ± ?m), JOAG ( ± ?m), and you may OHT ( ± ?m) people. This indicates OHT customers got rather heavy CCT than the glaucoma communities (p = 0.004, t test). This new linear regression shows that this difference between CCT between the groups wasn’t correlated as we grow older otherwise sex. Leaving out OHT clients, POAG ( ± ?m) and you may NTG ( ± ?m) communities had quite leaner average CCT than PXG, PACG, and JOAG groups. not, the real difference one of several glaucoma subtypes was not mathematically significant (p = 0.296, t attempt).

BÌNH LUẬN

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Website này sử dụng Akismet để hạn chế spam. Tìm hiểu bình luận của bạn được duyệt như thế nào.